Virginia has been a university English instructor for over 20 years.
These are basically unresolvable with anything less than a lifetime of philosophical work, but they usually allow mutual understanding and respect. More detail on what I mean by each level: Meta-debate is discussion of the debate itself rather than the ideas being debated.
Is one side being hypocritical? Are some of the arguments involved offensive? Is someone being silenced? What biases motivate either side?
Is someone defying a consensus? Who is the underdog? I even think it can sometimes be helpful to argue about which side is the underdog. If it works, supporting one side of an argument imposes so much reputational cost that only a few weirdos dare to do it, it sinks outside the Overton Window, and the other side wins by default.
This is part of the process that creates polarization and echo chambers. The best result is that you never went into that space at all. They may sometimes suggest what might, with a lot more work, be a good point. And it might greatly decrease the number of guns available to law-abiding people hoping to defend themselves.
So the cost of people not being able to defend themselves might be greater than the benefit of fewer criminals being able to commit crimes.
But this would be a reasonable argument and not just a gotcha. Single facts are when someone presents one fact, which admittedly does support their argument, as if it solves the debate in and of itself.
Second, even things with some bad features are overall net good. Trump could be a dishonest businessman, but still have other good qualities. Hillary Clinton may be crap at email security, but skilled at other things.
Even if these facts are true and causal, they only prove that a plan has at least one bad quality. At best they would be followed up by an argument for why this is really important.
I think the move from shaming to good argument is kind of a continuum. This level is around the middle.Feb 19, · A MONTH ago, I felt that I was in good health, even robust health.
At 81, I still swim a mile a day. But my luck has run out — a few weeks ago I learned that I . In , Paul Graham wrote How To Disagree Better, ranking arguments on a scale from name-calling to explicitly refuting the other person’s central point.. And that’s why, ever since , Internet arguments have generally been civil and productive.
Graham’s hierarchy is useful for its intended purpose, but it isn’t really a hierarchy of disagreements. Is this your first time to write a reflection paper?You may have little or no idea how a reflection paper should be like.
A reflection essay is normally about a personal experience . The Movie That Changed My Life is one of those books that the reader immediately feels like participating in. The question or assignment that editor, David Rosenberg, gave twenty writers about twenty years ago was--"What was a movie that you remember really affecting you when you saw it as a .
How to Write a Reflection Paper. In this Article: Article Summary Sample Outline and Paper Brainstorming Organizing a Reflection Paper As You Write Community Q&A Reflection papers allow you to communicate with your instructor about how a specific article, lesson, lecture, or experience shapes your understanding of class-related material.
One evening over dinner, I began to joke, as I often had before, about writing an essay called “Men Explain Things to Me.” Every writer has a stable of ideas that never make it to the racetrack, and I’d been trotting this pony out recreationally every once in a while.